Choose a useful first question
Pick a release, a recurring backlog review or a capacity decision. Name the people responsible for the work and the outcome they need from the discussion.
Start with context. Make uncertainty visible. Give every next step a source and an owner.
Start with projects, tasks and the decisions behind them. Review the records and relationships your team needs before agreeing on an integration setup.
Explore this capabilityIllustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Review recorded throughput, dependencies and scope. Discuss the forecast intervals and the assumptions that could change the result.
Explore this capabilityIllustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Ask a question, inspect its sources and turn the answer into a proposed task or plan. A person stays responsible for accepting consequential changes.
Explore this capabilityIllustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Choose a real planning question, make the required context clear and agree on what you will review before broadening the workflow.
Pick a release, a recurring backlog review or a capacity decision. Name the people responsible for the work and the outcome they need from the discussion.
Bring project records, explicit dependencies and relevant delivery history. Confirm source ownership, required permissions and the definitions used for scope and completed work.
Compare the proposals with your actual workflow. Inspect missing context, uncertain forecasts and action boundaries, then decide what a broader setup would need.
| Planning question | Context to bring |
|---|---|
| What changed? | Compare current scope, task status and availability with the assumptions behind the last plan. |
| What is blocking the release? | Trace explicit prerequisites and ask the owner to confirm unresolved dependencies. |
| What can fit next? | Review the candidate work against available capacity and the sequence required to complete it. |
| What are we agreeing to? | Record the reviewed scope, owner and target alongside the uncertainty that remains. |
Yes. The public demonstrations use fictional project records and can be explored without creating an account or connecting a company system.
Start with a project whose work and history you can explain. A narrow workflow makes it easier to inspect data quality, permissions and whether the proposed views support a useful decision.
The site provides interactive examples. Invited workspace access, integration availability and production requirements are confirmed with the Stark team.
Bring the plan, the work and the next decision together.