Name the operation
Define whether the integration retrieves context, requests a forecast or proposes a task. Use stable resource identifiers and an explicit schema for each operation.
Developer Platform
Build around the way your team delivers.
Explore API and MCP patterns for project context, forecast requests and reviewed workflow actions.
ACDFMC+1
Illustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Model the resource
Use stable project and task identifiers in integrations.
ENG-284Linked context
Validate the request
Keep authentication and authorization on the server.
Review the range
Design for a safe retry
Use idempotency for actions that create or update work.
Ready for reviewHuman approval
A practical workflow
Build an integration you can reason about.
Start with the resource, validate the request and make the result clear enough for a caller to handle success and failure.
Validate at the boundary
Check authentication, authorization and request fields on the service handling the operation. Treat model-generated parameters and document text as untrusted inputs.
Handle the response
Distinguish a successful result from an unavailable source, rejected permission or transient error. Bound retries and make repeated write requests safe through an agreed idempotency contract.
A connected working example
Use a shared contract across clients.
The code demonstration separates MCP configuration from a forecast request. Both describe an intended interface and use illustrative values, allowing a setup discussion without presenting an unverified public API.
A consistent resource model helps each client refer to the same project and scope. Agree on identifiers, error states and permission boundaries before implementing an integration against an approved endpoint.
ACDFMC+1
Illustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Inside the approach
How the model works.
The code samples describe an integration contract, not a publicly available API. Discuss endpoint availability, scopes, limits and credentials with the Stark team before implementation.
Methodology and evaluation01Validated request
02Authorized operation
03Structured response
Before you move forward
Questions to resolve before implementation.
| Review | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Availability | Confirm the endpoint, version, supported operations and client requirements. |
| Authentication | Agree on credential issuance, storage, rotation and revocation. |
| Limits | Discuss request limits, payload bounds, timeouts and which errors are retryable. |
| Write safety | Define idempotency, approvals and the status returned when an operation is already complete. |
Questions & answers
A few useful answers.
Are these public API docs?
The samples illustrate integration contracts. Confirm endpoint availability, current schemas and limits with the Stark team before building a production client.
Can I copy the examples?
The Copy control copies the visible illustrative sample. Replace placeholders only with configuration supplied through an approved setup.
What should happen after a timeout?
A caller should not assume that a write failed merely because the response was lost. An agreed idempotency key and status lookup help prevent duplicate work.
Ship what you promised.
Bring the plan, the work and the next decision together.