Ask a concrete question
Begin with a named project and the decision you need to make. A question about a release date, blocker or scope change gives the discussion a useful starting point.
Ask Stark
Ask a question. Get the work behind the answer.
Discuss delivery, dependencies and next steps with an assistant grounded in the context available to your workspace.
ACDFMC+1
Illustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Follow the sources
Inspect the task and decision records cited in an answer.
ENG-284Linked context
Make a useful draft
Turn the discussion into a proposed plan with owners.
Review the range
Approve the action
Review suggested tasks before they are created.
Ready for reviewHuman approval
A practical workflow
Move from a question to a reviewed proposal.
Ask about the project, inspect the records behind the answer and decide which next step belongs in the plan.
Follow the evidence
Read the forecast and the linked task or decision references. Check whether the cited records are current and whether any context is missing from the answer.
Review the proposed action
Separate the explanation from the proposed tasks. In the demonstration, creating the suggested plan adds six tasks to the fictional interface after you choose the action.
A connected working example
Give the answer somewhere useful to lead.
A migration question can lead to a cutover checklist with validation, rollback and ownership questions. Each proposed task should be grounded in the recorded work, then reviewed for relevance.
The project table is a useful companion to that conversation. Compare owners and current status before deciding which proposals should enter the backlog and which belong in a later sprint.
ACDFMC+1
Illustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
Inside the approach
How the model works.
An assistant retrieves relevant records, then drafts an answer. Generated text can be wrong or incomplete. Citations help you review the source; actions remain separate from the answer.
Methodology and evaluation01Question
02Retrieved context
03Cited proposal
Before you move forward
An answer and an action have different checks.
| Review | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Question | Name the project and the decision. Include the scope or deadline that gives the answer meaning. |
| Evidence | Inspect cited sources for freshness, completeness and relevance to the question. |
| Proposal | Check task wording, ownership and sequence. Generated text can omit a constraint or misunderstand a decision. |
| Approval | Confirm authority for any real write action separately from the model’s explanation. |
Questions & answers
A few useful answers.
What is connected in this public demo?
The chat reads fictional demonstration context. It does not access your company’s records or establish a live third-party connection.
Can I create the proposed tasks?
Yes, within the demo. Choose the task-creation action to see the six proposed tasks added to the illustrative interface.
What if the cited source is incomplete?
Treat the answer as incomplete too. Ask the owner for the missing context and review the proposal before changing real work or a commitment.
Ship what you promised.
Bring the plan, the work and the next decision together.