Choose the question
Name the project decision and the records needed to discuss it. Keep the proposed connection limited to that purpose.
Stark for ChatGPT
Bring project context into ChatGPT.
Explore an illustrative connection pattern for ChatGPT. Integration availability, supported actions and authorization are confirmed during workspace setup.
ChatGPT
A better question starts with context.
Give an assistant scoped access to the work it needs to discuss. Keep project evidence, uncertainty and approval boundaries in the answer.
- Choose the records a connection can read.
- Review source-backed proposals.
- Confirm write permissions independently.
ACDFMC+1
Illustrative workspace · interactive demonstration
How the connection works.
A workspace owner approves access, the integration retrieves scoped project context and a person reviews any proposed action. This demonstration creates no third-party connection.
01Approved access
02Project context
03Reviewed proposal
An illustrative workflow
Give a project question an inspectable source.
An assistant can discuss a delivery decision more usefully when it has the relevant project context. Choose the records needed for the question and keep missing information visible.
The illustrative MCP pattern separates reading context from changing work. Review the cited source, forecast assumptions and proposed tasks before allowing a consequential action.
Meridian · illustrative workspaceFor review
Decision brief
Atlas migration · a question with context
01
The question
What changes if the team adds scope to the migration?
02
The context
Current scope, fictional throughput history and recorded dependencies.
03
The response
A conditional forecast and a proposal to review with the delivery owner.
Fictional example. No third-party connection or external action is made by this demonstration.
A practical workflow
Connect with a clear purpose.
Confirm access and support
Review the client, source owner, endpoint availability and required permissions with the team before configuring a real connection.
Inspect the first result
Check the answer against its sources and review any proposal. Confirm the write boundary before broadening the workflow.
Before you move forward
Resolve the setup details first.
| Review | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Client support | Confirm the supported ChatGPT connection method and endpoint for the intended workspace. |
| Authorization | Agree on who is calling the tool and which project resources they may access. |
| Tool contract | Define inputs, structured outputs and the behavior when a source cannot be retrieved. |
| Write review | Keep task creation or plan changes behind the required permission and approval boundary. |
Questions & answers
A few useful answers.
Is there a public connector I can enable here?
The demonstration does not install a connector. Confirm current support, availability and setup with the Stark team.
What does the configuration show?
It shows an illustrative MCP server entry with an endpoint and token placeholder. Approved connection details must be supplied during setup.
Can an answer change a project automatically?
A generated answer does not grant authority. Any real write tool must verify permissions and the applicable review requirements.
Ship what you promised.
Bring the plan, the work and the next decision together.